Main topic: Canada needs to implement a ‘Comprehensive Sexual Health Curriculum or Program” in schools across the country.
Background
Problem: Young people are unprepared for the sexual world; being unprepared is leading to a rise in harmful health related situations and a decrease in maturity and emotional stability of adults.
Thesis: Canada is neglecting young peoples’ rights and endangering them by not giving them the necessary information and guidance to enter adulthood and have a healthy sexual life, because the landscape of sexuality has changed so much over the lest few decades, both the UN (United Nations) and WHO (the World Health Organization) have declared sexual health information to be a right we need to provide young people, and because current sex education programs leave too much out of the discussion.
Supporting Points:
A. The landscape of sexuality has changed so much over the last few decades, we have to adapt and change he programs we implement in the process of educating young people. When the current sex education program was developed, the landscape of sexuality was different and now it is just outdated and out-of-touch.
B. Young people have the right to information, declared through UN and WHO declarations and documentation. Because these organizations have determined that young people have this right, we are in violation if we do not make drastic changes to the sex education program currently in place in schools across Canada.
C. The current sex education program being used is leaving too much information out, and does not provide young people with enough education and information. By not providing them with the information they require in order to be prepared for sexual activity, we are forcing them to either experiment by participating in high-risk activities, or assume and speculate about sex.
ONE
I believe that if we do not educate our young people about sex in a more in-depth and informative way, the health of Canadians will be impaired, both physical and emotional.
The problem of STIs and unwanted pregnancies are not enough to hold off on implementing a comprehensive Sexual Health Program in school to safe guard young people from high-risk activities.
The sexual landscape of today is much different from the one that existed when the current sex education programs were developed and the kids of today are in much more danger from an atmosphere that does nothing to educate them about the sexual landscape of today.
TWO
A new and complete Comprehensive Sexual Health Program (CSHP), that informs and educates young people about sex will empower then and allow them to make more informed and wise decisions.
The Un, and the WHO have made declarations and formed advisory documents that state a child/young person has the right to information and that there is a global need to for a more in-depth and informative sex education program worldwide.
If you have children, know young people or know others who do, you have a voice and even if you do not yet have any children, you have a responsibility to the to them, to ensure that there is a CSHP in effect for them when they reach that age.
Speech:
Attention Grabber:
Distribute Condoms to the class.
Opening Line.
“This is a condom. Boys have penises and Girls have vaginas. The penis goes into the vagina, there is movement and you could catch and STI, STD or get pregnant. It is best to wait until you get married before you have sex.
+++ Pause +++
Is what I just did, sex education? Is it enough to prepare anyone, for a healthy sex life and provide them with enough information, for them to have sex safely and to know what to do in certain situations?
Fear and mistrust have been holding this issue back for a long time. Even with experts and the medical industry as well as young people, saying the same things, the rights of young people are put aside and the opinions of parents and other adults are used to make policy and design or maintain the current sex education programs.
The current program being used today, strives to delay the initiation of sex among young people, and to move them to more abstinence only, unless in marriage, while encouraging simple protective measures like condoms and other contraceptives.
This approach has been around for a long time, and because there has never been a widely used alternative, there are few statistics to support that a change in the curriculum would be beneficial. However, a need for a new more in-depth program has been recognized and recommended by almost all-major worldwide organizations – organizations that are not effected by local politics and elections.
These programs are effective in achieving one goal overall, but often are ineffective in achieving more than one per young person.
The current programs teach:
- Abstinence
- Condom and contraceptive use
- STIs and STDs
- Basic anatomy and function
The Goals of the current program are:
- Delay the initiation of sexual activity
- Reduce the number of sexual partners
- Increase the use of condoms and other contraceptives
The argument for the current program is that it has visual and usable results, seen to be beneficial lately and expected to increase over the long term. The fear of teaching young people about sex is that in dong so, it will encourage them to engage in sexual acts sooner, and that would lead to an increase in disease and teen pregnancy. The supporters of the current program see premarital sex as bad and that sex outside of marriage is the right choice for everyone.
That argument may have held merit in my teen years, 22 years ago, but it no longer holds any truth nor does it have any real foundation in research. Just in fear, and maybe religion.
Research has shown that by giving young people as much information as possible, through a Comprehensive Sexual Health Program, we increase their ability to make good choices and we empower them to act responsibly. Empowerment is the key, and by recognizing and treating them like they have a choice, they have a better chance of making the right one.
Comprehensive Sexual Health Programs (CSHP) are also more able to achieve more than one goal per young person. The idea that more education will lead to more empowerment is at the core of the comprehensive approach. This approach also takes into account what is best for the young person – safeguards their right to information.
The CSHP also have another benefit; they are designed to be taught by a qualified person and someone who has extensive knowledge about sexuality, sexual actions and the emotional situations that accompany sex, especially in the early years. This is especially important because when a person who has preconceived opinions and attitudes towards sex, teaches sex education those attitudes and opinions come out. They are unable to refrain from injecting them into the curriculum.
A Comprehensive Sexual Heath Educational Programs teach:
- Abstinence
- Condom and contraceptive use
- STIs and STDs
- Medications
- Action in specific situations
- Protective measures in relation to a sexual act
- Emotional and spiritual supportive strategies
- Masturbation and fantasy elements
- Dysfunction
- Homosexuality – gay and lesbian issues
- Gender roles and gender identity
- Sexuality and the media
- Abortion and the morning after pill
- Body image issues
- Sexual assault and harassment strategies
- Reduce number of partners
- Values and attitudes towards sex
- Communication skills
- And many other related subjects.
In Canada heterosexuality is the only part of sexuality that is discussed and often it is the immaturity and personal opinions of the teachers that implement these aspects. Often these teachers are barely qualified to teach sex education and have only basic training on the subject. In many cases, teachers themselves have personal feelings and attitudes, often unfavorable ones, towards gays and lesbians and trans gender or gender confused young people. The level of expertise that it takes to be objective while teaching sex is an absolute necessity and one of the Comprehensive Program’s most unique components.
Now I am not saying that having multiple partners is god or bad, but I do know that if you do not know what you enjoy or how you want 'it', something will be missing from your life. That something can eat away at you, and have disastrous effects on you, and those close to you.
Take a hypothetical situation. An adult of 45 years old. Realizes that they are gay or a lesbian, or bisexual or have trans gender or gender identity questions. They have three kids, a spouse and all the commitments that come with the age and those responsibilities. They realize they are attracted to the same sex or both, and looking back on their life, they realize they always were.
Lets look at another hypothetical situation. An adult of any age enters into a long-term commitment, maybe marriage and does not enjoy their sex life. Years go by, and they begin to seek what is missing, or what they think is missing and cheats on their significant other. Or they are too immature sexually to ask their significant other to try new things.
Divorce rates have never been higher in N.A. than they are right now and there have never been as many single people around the planet as there are at this moment. An argument could be made that because the sexual landscape has changed, that attitudes towards sex now require experience and experimentation, before marriage, that it is better to understand yourself and your sexual desires, turn ons and turn offs. Before entering into a long-term commitment like marriage – this could save a lot of grief and pain.
I am not suggesting that we teach young people how to have sex, or what position is fun, nor am I saying we teach proper etiquette about threesomes or group encounters. I am not saying we teach young people how to put a condom on someone with their mouth, or how to role play and what sex clubs they should try.
I am saying that we teach young people about sex, the feelings that come with it and teach young people to have the confidence so that they will be able to deal with the situations they may find themselves in.
It is a fact that many rapes, assaults and other sexual harassment situations go unreported. These can have long lasting and terrible effects on the person, because they were not prepared to deal with them or how to avoid them. This is our fault and our responsibility.
We can wear all the purple and pink we want, but if we are not teaching young people enough, we are neglecting their rights and we are in violation of the United Nations Charter on the Rights of the Child and the World Health Organization recommendations on teaching about sex to young people. Both of these worldwide organizations have declared and documented the need for a more comprehensive sex educations programs, to be taught to young people.
But this is what the idea of CSHP is being made out to be. People think more information will lead to more sex among young people; however, it is young people who are telling us that they want more information so that they do not have to have experiment to learn about sex.
Closing
Thank you very much, and if you have young people in your lives, talk to them; because, our politicians are too fucking old and politically impotent to do the right thing.